tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4098620.post113342681646941742..comments2024-03-15T04:02:42.341-04:00Comments on CrimLaw: Sue the Feds Over Refusal to Give Financial AidUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4098620.post-1133562251317966342005-12-02T17:24:00.000-05:002005-12-02T17:24:00.000-05:003 Rules of this blog1. No politics2. Civility3. N...3 Rules of this blog<BR/><BR/>1. No politics<BR/><BR/>2. Civility<BR/><BR/>3. No politics.Ken Lammershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15646250142814585354noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4098620.post-1133471957346167382005-12-01T16:19:00.000-05:002005-12-01T16:19:00.000-05:00You must understand that once you have so much as ...You must understand that once you have so much as touched that dope, you are a reprobate. User are losers and if you are a user and don't end up being a loser, the government will do its best to make you a loser. What would the children think if they saw someone use drugs and then successfully complete college and live a normal life?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4098620.post-1133459461036348162005-12-01T12:51:00.000-05:002005-12-01T12:51:00.000-05:00they should apply the same standards with immigrat...they should apply the same standards with immigration law violations. <BR/><BR/>Would that violate the "equal protection clause"?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4098620.post-1133459107426784802005-12-01T12:45:00.000-05:002005-12-01T12:45:00.000-05:00The purported logic behind lifetime penalties for ...The purported logic behind lifetime penalties for convicted sex offenders (e.g. registries) is, supposedly, an extremely high recidivism rate.<BR/><BR/>But that logic simply does not apply to drug convictions -- "once a drug possessor, always a drug possessor" is simply not accurate.<BR/><BR/>Perhaps that's the distinction that should be argued.KipEsquirehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02326513032807027956noreply@blogger.com