tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4098620.post8830791994795078482..comments2024-03-15T04:02:42.341-04:00Comments on CrimLaw: Is Requiring the Noble Act Unethical?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4098620.post-86994583346969484662011-01-03T10:52:33.268-05:002011-01-03T10:52:33.268-05:00Tissue type them before letting them out of prison...Tissue type them before letting them out of prison. If they aren't a match, deals off.ParatrooperJJnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4098620.post-72193013125033062262011-01-01T09:14:39.876-05:002011-01-01T09:14:39.876-05:00Well the amount of money should not be what is foc...Well the amount of money should not be what is focused on in this crime but rather what the criminals did-lured victims so that a shotgun was later held on the victims and victim's hit on their heads and so on. These women are thugs in my opinion so I do not see why they should get their sentences suspended. The excuse for letting one sister out is she is costing the prison system a lot of money for her care. The other sister said she will donate her kidney for her sister in crime (literally) but my question is this, who does the governor of Mississippi think will pay for the kidney transplant from one sister to the other? Taxpayers of course already have to pay for the incarceration and care of prisoners. Taxpayers will also be stuck footing the bill for this surgery on the two sisters, you just wait and see!I guess the governor is hoping the money will come from ALL taxpayers supporting charity hospitals that will have to foot or write off the cost of doing this type of transplant on these convicted sisters. I believe this because I doubt they have any money or enough money to pay for the cost of the two of them having this type of surgery done--well unless they plan on financing their surgery by holding people up again!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4098620.post-84162411379211733152010-12-31T16:37:50.485-05:002010-12-31T16:37:50.485-05:00Happy New Year's eve.
Its true, many have lat...Happy New Year's eve.<br /><br />Its true, many have latched onto the, "it was only $11 dollars" argument.<br /><br />But let us be fair here. If a person robs a bank and hauls $1,000 vs $10,000 their punishment will differ. If a home invader steals a $1,000 TV vs a jewelry box containing $10,000 in gems there will be a significant difference in sentence even if all other aspects of the crime are identical.<br /><br />The amount of financial loss is very often used to justify a longer sentence, so I have no problem if people push that the minimal loss practically screams out for questioning why a life sentence.<br /><br />Did they kill anyone - No<br />Cause permanent physical injury - No<br />Permanent mental injury - No<br />Unrepentant 3 strikers - No<br />Were they even the ones carrying the guns - No<br /><br />Those all matter, but I have to kind of side with those who presume that a life sentence, actually make that double life sentences to be served consecutively, may have been a bit extreme.<br /><br />But then again our system isn't perfect. <br /><br />Want an interesting read? Recall how you discussed (long ago) certain attorneys who would bang their hands on the desk, object, object, object, mistrial, mistrial and basically do more harm than good? Check out:<br />http://www.scribd.com/doc/21748820/Scott-transcripta<br /><br />Trial transcript, skip down to page 25 and skim through page 29. Haven't read the whole thing, but yeah, sounds like they had real winners. Probably some more gems in there.Bad Monkeyhttp://nobiscuit.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.com