Blogging Criminally For Over Ten Years
10/31/2003
It started out normally enough. The high point of Monday was when the prosecutor dropped four grand larceny charges and my client walked out of court free and clear. Tuesday was a day without any cases assigned so I spent it negotiating with Commonwealths and trying to get all the various paperwork (which never seems to end) done.
Wednesday got a little weird. I walk into district court in the morning and find out that my big case for the day had co-defendants (well, I already knew that) and that they have both hired counsel who were up at the bench as I walked in trying to convince the prosecutor that my client is the bad guy. I scotch that notion as quick as I can but the preliminary hearing doesn't take place because the prosecutor hasn't been able to locate a witness and the judge grants a continuance. Then I go up to the circuit court because I've got couple hours to kill before my next case and I go in and sit down to watch part of a civil jury. I no sooner sit down then I hear the plaintiff's attorney telling the judge, "Your honor, at this point I want to read the doctors' testimony into evidence but I didn't bring anyone to read the doctors' parts so I guess I'll just read it all." Yep, you guessed it - the judge looks into the gallery and says, "Well Mr. Lammers is here. He could read the doctors' parts." So I hustle up to the witness stand, get handed a transcript, and have to read cold testimony which includes all sorts of fun terms like "pneumothoraxic." What fun. All I can say is thank God I took Latin in high school and a semester of Greek in college.
That afternoon I get bounced around a little bit because the prosecutor's office isn't really sure who is assigned to my cases the next day but I finally track them down. In particular I talk to one about the bench trial we have Thursday afternoon which is for felony petit larceny and assaulting a police officer. We bang out what is a very reasonable offer and I spend 40 minutes driving down to Riverside Regional Jail. Then I wait over two hours before I am finally able to see my client. A hour after that I leave and drive straight home (another hour; it's 9:30 when I get home).
Thursday started out O.K. In the morning the prosecutor drops a grand larceny charge against my client and reduces the felony selling fake drugs to a misdemeanor selling fake drugs. The kid gets 30 days actual jail time and is approved for work release so I'm feeling like I'm actually doing pretty good (should have known better). I watch another attorney do jury selection and opening arguments and then go get lunch at what passes for a cafeteria in the local courthouse1.
Finishing early, I go to the basement holding area and talk to my client. Afterward I go and tell the prosecutor that the deal she offered has not been accepted; she asks if we are going to have a bench trial and I tell her yes. At 1 p.m. the prosecutor and I are sitting in the courtroom waiting. My client's witness is missing and her officer has not shown up. About 5 minutes later my witness shows but the officer is still not there. The prosecutor goes off, makes some phone calls, and comes back to tell us the officer is on the way. He finally shows up in sweats having come straight to court from the gym. I go back to tell my client we're about to start and we have a discussion. I come out and tell the prosecutor that a jury trial is going to be demanded.
At about 1:45 the judge sits at the bench. I stand up and tell him that the right to a jury trial is being asserted. The judge looks about as upset as I have ever seen this particular judge and says, "O.K. Mr. Lammers then we're going to have the deputies assemble a jury and we'll start at 3 p.m." As soon as the judge leaves the bench I bolt downstairs and take care of two cases I have in district court. The prosecutor in district court is kind enough to expedite my matters which thankfully were not complicated (a trespass dropped by the prosecutor and a petit larceny continued because the prosecutor did not have his witness). Still, it takes over 1/2 hour and I run over to get a copy of the instructions which the prosecutor has printed up - thankfully, none of them are objectionable. Heading back upstairs, I get there exactly at 3 p.m., just in time to wait another 30 minutes for the 20th juror to arrive.
The judge calls my client out and arraigns him; my client pleads not guilty to both petit larceny and assaulting an officer. The judge asks him if he's ready for trial (yes) and a series of questions to make sure he knows what's going on. Then he asks him if he's ready for trial a second time and the kid says, "No." The judge questions him about that and the kid's answer is pretty much incomprehensible - all that really makes sense is that he wants a continuance. I try to help him distill what he's saying but it doesn't get much better and there comes that moment where he starts saying things about me. At that point I just pick a point on the wall and stare at it (attorney-client privilege being the wonderful thing it is I am unable to talk). Finally, the judge cuts him off and asks if he is happy with my representation; he says, "Yes" and the judge moves on with the trial. I, of course, have to stand up and make a formal motion to continue based on my client's desires but the judge, of course, denies it.
Then we go to trail. It's not too long - the only witnesses are the officer, my client's aunt, and my client. The jury's out for more than a hour before they send a note to the judge telling him they have a verdict on one charge but are totally deadlocked on the other. The judge brings them out and asks the foreman for the verdict forms. The foreman says he hasn't filled them out yet so the judge sends the jury back in to do so (he tells them to write something like "deadlocked" on the one they disagree on). They go back in and then return about 10 minutes later. The forms are handed up to the judge and he reads "Guilty" for the felony petit larceny and we are all a little shocked when rather than "deadlocked" he reads "Not Guilty" on the felony assault of a police officer. Apparently, when they went back the last time whoever the holdout was must have finally come around.
However, then the jury has to go back in to decide the sentence for the felony petit larceny. The jury returns with a sentence of 3 years and 6 months on a petit larceny of a $5.00 T-shirt, instantly turning a pretty hard fought win into a pyrrhic victory. That's 3 times the sentence he probably would have received if the judge had found him guilty of both charges and sentenced him. The judge asks for motions and I ask for a poll but I really can't pay attention because I am arguing with my client. The judge asks for further motions and I say "No" so he starts to sentence my client and I have to break in and tell him I thought he would do that outside the presence of the jury and I need to speak to my client. He sends the jury out and I tell him I need some time to talk to my client because we are having a difference of opinion as to whether he should have a sentencing hearing (wherein I might convince the judge to suspend part of the jury's sentence). Rather than giving me time the judge tells us that he wants a sentencing hearing and that ends the discussion. My client is led away (I go and talk to him for a few minutes) and the jury is dismissed. Actual sentencing will happen sometime in January.
Gotta love trying a full blown felony jury trial on the fly.
1 Not that I'm complaining. Before they started this place up in the court's basement about half the time my lunch consisted of the ubiquitous snack machine crackers and cola.
10/31/2003
10/31/2003
(1) You just can't pocket the money for the ticket. I find the part about "officers patrolling the interstate [being] encouraged to write two tickets an hour" interesting since everybody I know denies that there are quotas.
(2) No criminal charges for shooting a lady waving a vegetable peeler.
(3) The public doesn't get to know the facts about officers who are charged.
(4) I wanna be a cop in Rio.
10/31/2003
(1) If you escape from jail why would you go right to a store and get caught shoplifting?
(2) A prison riot ends after a reporter goes in.
10/31/2003
10/31/2003
10/31/2003
10/31/2003
10/30/2003
First they change our money from a very classy look to a primitive, monopoly money look. Then they make it look even more like something from the 3d world and ugly by adding weird colors (peach? OMG).
And still counterfeiting takes place. And should we be surprised? My rather primitive home scanner is able to make the copy above. Imagine what someone with a scanner that cost more than $100 can do.
What really annoys me here is that the really serious deterrents (the strip, the ink that changes color, microprinting, watermarking) could have all been done with the old bill and retained some class instead of changing to the new Bozo-bills.
10/30/2003
10/30/2003
Of course, I don't want it here; if they did this in the jails hereabouts my business would probably drop off.
10/30/2003
10/30/2003
10/30/2003
10/30/2003
10/30/2003
(1) "[A] San Jose police training instructor waved about a foot-long knife on the witness stand during the probe of a controversial killing of a Vietnamese woman . . . [whom] San Jose police Officer Chad Marshall shot . . . as police say the distraught woman "brandished" a 10-inch Asian vegetable peeler."
Naw, there's no way he was trying to bias the grand jury.
(2) Plant guns - go to jail.
(3) The City of Richmond is so desperate for the new mall to succeed that it is paying overtime to officers to protect it.
10/29/2003
10/29/2003
10/29/2003
10/29/2003
10/29/2003
10/29/2003
The Police chief in Richmond says there is a gang problem in Richmond.
And the sky is blue, and robins fly, and dogs bark, and fire burns, and . . .
10/29/2003
10/29/2003
10/29/2003
10/29/2003
10/28/2003
(1) Even if the (failed) target of your hit says you are not guilty you can be found so.
(2) In the Rudolph case the trial has to take place sometime - doesn't it?
(3) After serving 25 years on a murder charge a man turns down "time served" in favor of a new trial, a witness recants, and he is a free man.
(4) A scholarship from people on death row?
10/28/2003
10/28/2003
10/28/2003
10/28/2003
10/28/2003
10/28/2003
10/28/2003
10/28/2003
10/28/2003
10/28/2003
Top rock star charged with human trafficing - in India.
But it's probably just because she didn't think of it first.
10/28/2003
10/28/2003
10/27/2003
found here.
10/27/2003
The jury is the high point of amateurism, potentially a recipe for incompetence and bias. The mood of civilised systems of criminal justice increasingly demands professionalism. I am not contemptuous of the amateur’s ability to judge human conduct, only the task of evaluating evidence in the courtroom, which is a job for professionals. We should be able to trust those trained to be judges — and to start educating the public that the dismantling, or even ultimate disappearance, of its cherished institution will not be disastrous. It will bring clarity and purpose to the process of ensuring that justice is done.This is exactly the person jury trials were put into place to keep in check - "the professional."
Juries guard against people as full of themselves as this gentleman who think the people should have little or no input in the day-to-day activities of justice. They guard against those professionals who are so ensconced in the system as to become mere cogs in the machine which tends toward conviction1. Juries guard against the relationship which develops between law enforcement and the professionals in the courtroom2.
Personally, I think it is a failure that more people are not tried by jury3. There is, of course, a huge judicial efficiency argument against this. However, I suspect that if there were not a strong distrust of the citizenry in the system this would be overcome.
1 I find it very hard to believe that people are more likely to be convicted by juries than judges. I've had more than one judge tell me he would have convicted my client after he was found innocent (and at least one before).
2 I've seen juries decide to believe my client over the story being told by the police officer. I've seen judges accept some amazing testimony from officers. Juries often have a better insight as to what really goes on between officers and the population. Note that we don't allow juries to decide some of those very interesting stories which are told by officers in order to justify a stop or search - they'd probably kick out many more cases than the judges do.
3 I am speaking here as a citizen not as a defense attorney. There are all sorts of procedural and substantive reasons which keep me from recommending trial by jury for most of my clients in Virginia.
10/27/2003
Hmmm . . . I may have to start reading InstaPundit more often.
10/26/2003
10/26/2003
10/26/2003
10/26/2003
10/26/2003
10/26/2003
How do you get the time to build it? How do you get the materials? How do the guards not notice a brand new wall?
10/26/2003
(1) Getting time for doing someone else's time.
(2) Robbing a bank and waiting for the police.
(3) The trike bandit.
(4) Shaving your head, pretending you have cancer, and acting deaf is not a good thing.
(5) If you make yourself noticeable the police will find you.
10/26/2003
10/26/2003
Actually, you have to admire the fact that they are fixing their mistake. It would just be nice if they could have done it sooner.
10/24/2003
10/23/2003
10/23/2003
10/23/2003
10/23/2003
No kidding? You mean those guys who are all fired up and yelling at me when I meet with them on Tuesday but sit in a corner and barely talk to me on Thursday have something wrong with them? What about the guys I have to sit and explain something to 15 to 20 times because they just can't seem to comprehend anything that takes longer than 10 seconds to explain? Or the guys who leave messages so long that they fill up my voice-mail but never say anything pertinent to the case? You mean these guys have mental problems?
Yet, when I get court ordered evaluations for them almost all seem to pass the legal standard for competency.
10/23/2003
10/23/2003
10/23/2003
Congress and the Attorney General have instituted policies designed to intimidate and threaten judges into refusing to depart downward, and those policies are working.
10/23/2003
(1) A description of how Muhammad was doing in the courtroom.
(2) And now he doesn't want to represent himself anymore.
(3) Which most think is a good idea.
10/22/2003
As I am wont to do, I checked the usage stats on my site this morning and can report the following:
Somebody spent 70 minutes reading my site yesterday. Never thought I was that interesting. Heck, I don't even spend 70 minutes a day reading my site.
Most of my hits come from US. More - although not a majority - come from the Eastern time zone. Next is the Central, followed by Pacific, and finally Mountain.
Most of the site's hits come from numbers or some internet service provider and are generically identified as something like "att.net". However, those I can ID have broken down something like this in the last few days:
Schools
U.Texas
Washington & Jefferson
UNC
Albany Law School
Georgia State
Vanderbilt
U. Maryland
U. Pitt.
Chowan College
U. Iowa
Lewis and Clark College
Fitzwilliam College - Cambridge
U. Washington
Yale
Notre Dame
MIT
Iowa State
Countries
France
U.K.
Japan
Brazil
Romania
Iceland
Government
Bernalillo County, New Mexico
Army
Navy
Air Force
Department of Justice
U.S. Courts
(either there are several of you or one of you really enjoys this site)
US Patent Office
Baltimore State Attorney's Office
Fermi National Accelerator Labratory
There are also a number of hits I'm getting from ".us" preceded by va, ca, il, fl, me, mn, de, nv, et cetera. I assume these are government although the provider for that suffix only identifies them as being reserved in Northern Virginia.
U.Texas
Washington & Jefferson
UNC
Albany Law School
Georgia State
Vanderbilt
U. Maryland
U. Pitt.
Chowan College
U. Iowa
Lewis and Clark College
Fitzwilliam College - Cambridge
U. Washington
Yale
Notre Dame
MIT
Iowa State
Countries
France
U.K.
Japan
Brazil
Romania
Iceland
Government
Bernalillo County, New Mexico
Army
Navy
Air Force
Department of Justice
U.S. Courts
(either there are several of you or one of you really enjoys this site)
US Patent Office
Baltimore State Attorney's Office
Fermi National Accelerator Labratory
There are also a number of hits I'm getting from ".us" preceded by va, ca, il, fl, me, mn, de, nv, et cetera. I assume these are government although the provider for that suffix only identifies them as being reserved in Northern Virginia.
10/21/2003
In Virginia we charge the indigent for costs of the trial (including attorney fees) if they lose the trial. If they don't pay it off (as most cannot) their drivers license is suspended1. Then they are picked up on driving suspended charges and have more fines and jail time. Of course, they still can't pay off the fines and their licenses remain suspended and they are picked up again for driving suspended and get more fines and costs and can't pay those . . . et cetera, et cetera, et cetera . . .
It's not exactly just but I don't know that it is unconstitutional. Maybe I'll raise it in a future trial to see how that question would be answered.
1 Theoretically, they can be hauled back into court and have some or all of any suspended time or suspended fines from their original disposition imposed. However, of the 5 jurisdictions I see fairly regularly only one does this and then only in the district court.
10/21/2003
(1) The judge tried pretty hard to talk him out of representing himself.
(2) Muhammad drops the possibility of using mental issues in his defense.
(3) An officer had Muhammad in front of him after a killing and let him go.
10/21/2003
10/21/2003
10/21/2003
On the other hand, the judge didn't seem too pleased.
10/21/2003
10/21/2003
Last time I checked NGRI still lands you in a State institution - only this one has nice padded walls.
10/21/2003
10/21/2003
10/21/2003
Yeah, that'll get rid of the curse.
10/21/2003
10/21/2003
1984?
10/21/2003
Never thought that I'd have to carry papers and submit myself to proving who I am at the whim of a police officer.
I'm not sure this even rises to the level of the incredibly abused "resonable articulable suspicion of a particularized criminal activity1."
1 You know, the standard that allows police to stop cars because the driver has the temerity to hang a rosary from the rearview mirror.
10/21/2003
10/21/2003
I understand what the attorney was trying to accomplish but . . .
10/21/2003
10/21/2003
10/21/2003
10/21/2003
10/21/2003
(1) Muhammad's does his own opening statement.
(2) The prosecutor's strategy for the trial.
10/20/2003
10/20/2003
DMW
10/20/2003
The sad thing is that the caps imposed by the Legislature still leave us as one of the lowest paying States.
Indigent representation by court appointed counsel jumped 17.4% in one year from 193,352 people to 227,058 people. Not sure what the cause of that is. The courts have actually been able to get $4.5 million in fees paid out (7.8%) back from clients who were convicted. I'd guess this is from people desperately trying to pay off their fines/costs so they might someday be able to get their licenses back (from my perspective, we seem to take your license if you sneeze the wrong way in Virginia).
Disturbing: If the number of people represented by court appointed counsel has risen 17.4% one can extrapolate that a similar jump has probably occured in numbers represented by public defenders. Yet we see little or no rise in funds to the public defender offices over the last five years. One might suspect that the offices are set up to save money and then not given increases in funding and/or manpower even if the workload rises.
10/20/2003
10/20/2003
10/20/2003
10/19/2003
(1) Better not kill a whole lot of people in Europe - you might get 17 years in prison.
(2) Jayson Williams' trial is moved because of pretrial publicity.
(3) In the Baylor basketball killing the Defendant has decided not to fight extradition.
(4) The Scott Peterson case is continued because his lawyer cannot be there.
(5) The prosecutors think that they have the murderer. The only problem is that DNA evidence at the scene points to another guy.
(6) Does the fact that you had two psychologists testify in the stead of one psychiatrist make representation of your client incompetent?
(7) The Sniper Cases:
(a) Muhammad pled not guilty.
(b) 13 jurors were chosen on the first day.
(c) On the second day only 7 jurors were chosen.
(d) When the jury was completed it had 10 women and five men (including three alternates). All but two of the jurors are white.
(e) Malvo has been subpoenaed for the trial.
(f) The Defense strategy for the trial is probably just to keep Muhammad alive.
(g) The judge in the Malvo case bars Defense witnesses by refusing to allow video testimony despite the fact that several cannot even come into the States.
10/19/2003
10/19/2003
(1) Oakland is being sued because police killed a man in his bedroom and Providence is being sued because its officers killed one of their own.
(2) Des Moines police are asking for fines for false robbery alarms.
(3) Police in California urge car taxes to remain in place.
(4) Two officers suspended after being accused of using a toilet plunger.
10/19/2003
10/19/2003
10/19/2003
10/19/2003
10/19/2003
10/19/2003
10/17/2003
"We mean it as no hollow warning when we say that prosecutors risk reversal of otherwise proper convictions when they engage in conduct of this kind."
10/17/2003
10/17/2003
I notice from the article that most of the stories concern females (only one concerns a drunk guy who quickly fessed up). Does anyone know if this is an accurate portrayal of who files these false reports or if the article is just unintentionally misleading?
10/17/2003
10/17/2003
10/17/2003
10/17/2003
"There seemed to be a total lack of concern about profound errors committed by certain members of the lab's staff . . . Although seemingly criminal, these acts do not meet the necessary requirements for indictment."
10/17/2003
10/17/2003
10/17/2003
10/17/2003
. . . questions the guy who tries to do at least 1 DOD level wipe of his computer every month despite the fact that he really doesn't do anything which makes it necessary. Heck, I don't even store credit card info on my computer.
10/17/2003
In addition to the type of crime this article concerns I can say that since I've been observing the federal district court in Richmond I've seen any number of cases involving strong-arm robberies, low level possession with intent to distribute, and/or gun possession charges. I was really surprised to see AUSA's prosecuting cases with a couple grams of cocaine and a pistol. I've handled far more serious cases in the Commonwealth's courts. I don't yet have enough experience in the federal court to offer an opinion as to why these cases are being prosecuted in federal court rather than the courts of Richmond.
10/17/2003
10/17/2003
Now the feds can concentrate on everybody else they are indicting in the Richmond government.
10/17/2003
Of course, Spence doesn't believe his client did it and eventually the evidence bears out his belief2. At the very least, even assuming that the evidence as laid out in the book is slanted (it is), there is clearly reasonable doubt created by the lies of the prosecutor's primary witness in combination with some forensic evidence which heavily favors the Defense. Am I being vague here? Yes, I am. Mr. Spence spent the time to write it3, go spend some time reading it. It's worth the time.
1 Which is why I'm writing about it rather than posting stories I've researched - hopefully I'll put bullets up later today.
2 Only prosecutors seem to write about cases they lost so that they can rail against a system which lets so many evil-doers escape justice - because we've all seen how 98% of defendants are found not guilty. [further snide remarks against prosecutors deleted by self-censorship]
3 As far as I can tell it wasn't ghost-written.
10/16/2003
10/16/2003
10/16/2003
10/16/2003
10/16/2003
Huh?
10/16/2003
10/16/2003
10/16/2003
10/16/2003
10/15/2003
"Illiterate Cave Dwellers"
How to poison the jury pool all by your lonesome in Eastern Kentucky.
10/15/2003
The Times captures the essence of my dogs perfectly.
10/15/2003
10/15/2003
10/15/2003
10/15/2003
10/15/2003
10/15/2003
10/15/2003
10/15/2003
10/14/2003
Today jury selection begins in the Muhammad sniper case. 800 people have signed up for a lottery for the 5 whole seats to be provided for the public in this "open hearing."
10/14/2003
(1) Malvo will be pleading insanity.
(2) The NC Peterson case results in a conviction for murder but the appeal is on the way.
(3) Making a man sane so you can be sure he understands when you kill him. That's the epitome of a just and humane society.
(4) The shame of a "honor killing" leads to life imprisonment.
(5) A man accused of killing some people found buried in his back yard chooses not to stay in jail but later changes his mind.
(6) If you keep a disgusting house and don't hold your son to proper hygiene standards you will be held guilty of "risk of injury to a minor" if he commits suicide.
(7) Claiming you killed your friend and drank his blood to gain immortality will not gain you any sympathy with the jury.
(8) Are we killing people in a humane manner or just making it look that way?
(9) An ex-FBI agent charged with procuring a murder.
(10) A father kills a 57 year old, male prosecutor for having sex with his 22 year old drug addict son and gets 12 years in jail.
(11) Accidentally killing a man in a fight results in 5 years suspended prison time and a year of lock-in drug treatment programs.
10/14/2003
10/14/2003
10/14/2003
10/14/2003
Rates I see advertised on TV: 3 cents a minute (I don't know what the connection charge is) or $1 for 20 minutes
Rates at the new prison: 22 cents per minute ($1.25 to connect); $8 per 20 minutes
Rates at the closed prison: 89 cents per minute ($3.95 to connect); $22 per 20 minutes
10/14/2003
10/13/2003
DEAR FRIEND,
YOU WILL BE SURPRISE TO RECEIVE THIS LETTER BUT WHEN YOU GO THROUGH IT YOU MIGHT NOT BE SURPRISE AGAIN IF THE INFORMATION HAS SOMETHING TO DO WITH YOU. I AM THE CONFIDENTIAL SECRETARY FOR THE INVESTMENT CONTROLLER OF A SOUTH AFRICAN BASED INVESTMENT CORPORATION.MY BOSS/PARTNER INSTRUCTED ME TO CONTACT YOU IN RESPECT OF A CLAIM/DIVIDEND,WHICH MATURED SINCE 1998.THE INVESTOR AFTER COLLECTING THE SAID RETURN OF INVESTMENT FROM OUR FIRM AND DEPOSITED THE CASH WITH A SECURITY COMPANY DIED AFTER ONE WEEK IN A MOTOR ACCIDENT IN NOVEMBER 1998 AND FROM THE CONTENT OF HIS FILE WITH US,WE NOTICED THAT THERE WAS NO NEXT OF KIN IN HIS DETAILS AS HE PROMISED TO FORWARD THE INFORMATION LATTER TO US.
BUT THIS HE DID NOT PROVIDE UNTIL HIS DEATH. WITH FURTHER INVESTIGATION TO TRACE THE ROOT OF THE INVESTOR,THIS MADE THINGS MUCH COMPLEX AS THE INFORMATION WE GOT CONFIRMED THAT HIS WIFE AND ONLY SON DIED IN RUSSIA IN AN AIRCRASH IN THE YEAR 1998. HOWEVER,MY BOSS HAS TAKING IT UPON
HIMSELF TO TRACE THE NEXT OF KIN IF POSSIBLE TO CLAIM THE US$155,600,000.00 (ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY FIVE MILLION SIX HUNDRED THOUSAND UNITED STATE DOLLARS ONLY) WHICH IS THE TOTAL SUM PAYABLE TO THE NEXT OF KIN AS ALL THE LOCAL TAXES HAS ALREADY BEEN DEDUCTED AND THE CASH ALREADY WITHDRAWN FROM THE SOUTH AFRICAN RESERVE BANK AND BOXED. THE INVESTOR HAS DEPOSITED THIS AMOUNT /CASH WITH A SECURITY COMPANY WITHOUT THE COMPANY KNOWING THE CONTENT OF THE BOX FOR SECURITY REASONS BEFORE HIS DEATH. THE CONTENT WAS DECLEARED TO BE COMPANY TREASURE DOCUMENTS,FILES(PAPER) AND THE CORPORATION HAS PAID THE SECURITY COMPANY US$20,000,000.00 ON BEHALF OF THE BENEFICIARY AS THE INITIAL DEPOSIT FOR THE SAFE KEEPING OF THE BOX AS THEY HAVE CHARGED US$100.00 PER DAY FOR THE SAFE KEEPING. I AM CONTACTING YOU BECAUSE YOUR LAST NAME AND THAT OF THE INVESTOR IS THE SAME,WHICH MY BOSS SUSPECTED THAT YOU MIGHT BE THE INVESTOR'S RELATION. PLEASE RECORN FIRM TO US IMMEDIATELY IF YOU HAVE ANY BROTHER WHO WAS 68 YEARS OLD BEFORE HE DIED IN 1998.IF IT IS TRUE,WE WILL ARRANGE FOR YOU TO MAKE THIS CLAIM AS SOON AS POSSILBE.BUT IF NOT WE HAVE NO OTHER OPTION THAN TO PROCESS IT WITH YOUR NAME AND COLLECT THE MONEY TO AVOID THE CASH BEING RETURNED TO THE SOUTH AFRICA GOVERNMENT AS UNTRACABLE/UNCLAIMED DIVIDEND.
AS WE CANNOT AFFORD TO WAIT AND SEE SUCH AMOUNT OF MONEY WASTE INTO THE GOVERNMENT POCKET. FOR YOUR INFORMATION,IF YOU ARE WILLING TO ASSIST IN CLAMING THIS FUNDS, PLEASE CONTACT ME AS SOON AS POSSIBLE WITHIN THREE MONTHS FROM TODAY.BEFORE THE SOUTH AFRICAN GOVERNMENT TEAMS TO KNOW ABOUT IT. PLEASE DISREGARD MY PROPOSAL TO USE YOUR NAME TO CLAIM IT IF THE INVESTOR IS REALLY YOUR BROTHER.BUT IF NOT WE WILL SHARE THE MONEY ON 50% EACH AFTER THE CASH HAS BEEN PAID TO YOU. NOTE THAT THIS BUSINESS IS 100% LEGAL AND RISK FREE. PLEASE TREAT THIS AS MOST URGENT AND CONFIDENTIAL.
BEST REGARDS,
SAMUEL COKER
Hmmm . . you mean I might be able to get rich because someone with my name died and I could possibly help steal the funds? I'm all over it!
10/13/2003
(1) An officer returns to duty after he is shot. His attacker gets 40 years.
(2) A policeman can never rest - you never know when you might spot a fugitive.
(3) Police in Virginia Beach bust a robbery ring in connection with 19 robberies committed over the last 10 months in Virginia Beach alone. The seven men are facing a total of 300+ charges.
(4) Chicago promotes one of its own to superintendent.
(5) Rallying to the support of a family whose father died in the line of duty.
(6) College students interning as bobbies.
(7) The Brits are putting people thru 3 weeks of training and sending them out onto the street as "police community support officers" with limited powers. It's an interesting idea if they can work the bugs out.
(8) The Army is out of the police stations in Caracus.
(9) An officer gets Bill Gates to put money into fighting child pornography on the net.
10/13/2003
(1) The FBI cannot keep anyone as Chief of Counterterrorism.
(2) Chief constables in Britain are backing the consolidation of police power.
(3) Putting bobbies on the beat does not seem to reduce crime. The reason given? People expect too much.
(4) No contract for pay, pensions, or benefits is leading to illness in the L.A. Sheriff's department.
10/13/2003
(1) Two detectives allow a suspect to get heroin in order to get him to testify and allow themselves to be filmed doing it.
(2) Silliness in a local sheriff's election.
(3) An officer gets 5 years and 3 months for forcing women to undress during traffic stops.
(4) A prisoner grabs a gun and kills or wounds six guards.
(5) A deputy pleads guilty for taking shuttle debris.
10/13/2003
(1) Five policemen who are accused of killing a black leader will not go to trial because they are the only witnesses and the passage of time.
(2) Pull a gun and the officer will do what has to be done.
(3) Shot three times and going to prison.
(4) A retired officer walks down the street killing people.
10/13/2003
10/12/2003
10/11/2003
A comment on the FBI's activity in Philadelphia (found here).
10/11/2003
&cetera. &cetera. &cetera.
I suspect that the Legislature will not allow substantive change. We'll see a re-arrangement in a more orderly manner (maybe) and perhaps (if the legislature is brave) a rise in the felony larceny level from $200 to $400 or $500.
10/11/2003
(1) This is one of the sickest things I've read about in a while. Life is a lenient sentence.
(2) Claims that teachers were taping children up to restrain them.
(3) You cannot put a child abuser in the same cell as the person he abused 10 years prior. The victim will likely not react well.
10/11/2003
10/11/2003
10/11/2003
10/11/2003
10/11/2003
(1) The FBI, not content to merely bug a sitting mayor's office, take the mayor's wireless communicator.
(2) In Richmond, the city council is trying to go on as yet another person in the local government is charged by the feds.
(3) And in a refreshing change of pace, in NY local prosecutors are trying to take care of local malfeasance.
10/11/2003
10/11/2003
10/11/2003
10/11/2003
10/10/2003
Did you know that all criminal defense attorneys and plaintiffs' attorneys are evil liars who are loathed by everyone?
I can't speak for plaintiff's attorneys but yes, I must admit that ever since I decided to become a criminal defense attorney and signed that contract in blood I have striven to be evil incarnate. To that end I have modeled myself after my hero:
Ming the Merciless
Oh well, I must go off to court to do more evil deeds . . .
1 And I encourage them. They don't often change my mind but a rational explanation of another point of view is always worth seeing.
10/10/2003
A federal judge dismisses a racketeering charge, six health care fraud charges, a conspiracy to commit racketeering charge, a conspiracy to violate general criminal statutes charge, three counts of mail fraud and three counts of mail fraud using a kickback scheme before there is even a trial.
10/10/2003
I read this indictment. I tell you something ... we have seen a lot more serious obstruction cases. This is not the strongest obstruction case I have ever seen. This is not John Gotti.
10/10/2003
City leaders turned off the street lights because there was no proof they inhibited crime. Now they are getting their proof but, of course, it's dismissed as "anecdotal at best."
And here's one of the anecdotes.
10/10/2003
(1) In the State of Washington the Defense attempts to suppress the tape because the girl lied to the police and they relied upon those lies in the affidavit. Unless Washington has rights under its constitution which are greater than the lack of protection offered under Leon, I just don't see it succeeding.
(2) 24 years later a tape provides enough proof for the judge.
10/10/2003
Go ahead get yourself extradited to France. See if you like their prisons any more than the guy in "Catch Me If You Can" did.
10/10/2003
10/10/2003
10/09/2003
10/09/2003
10/09/2003
10/09/2003
Once upon a time - in a different life - I spent time at EPW compounds and this kind of behavior would never have been tolerated.
10/09/2003
10/08/2003
10/08/2003
10/08/2003
10/08/2003
10/08/2003
10/07/2003
(1) Appointed to Virginia Exile case (5 years mandatory). Visit client at a jail in another county and interview him. Have a bond hearing.
(2) Approximately two months later, have a preliminary hearing. Total work at this point = approximately 5 hours of work at $90 per hour1 ($450). Statute and funding from the Legislature limits payment to $112.
(3) Approximately two months later, prepare for bench trial and negotiate with Commonwealth Attorney. On the trial date, prosecutor offers 2 years but client declines and asks for a jury trial (a choice I agree with). Work at this point approximately 4 hours ($360).
(4) Approximately two months later, after serious negotiations the prosecutor offers 1 year and 6 months. Client declines and the jury trial is continued because witnesses have not been located. Work since first trial date 5 hours ($450).
(5) Approximately 2 months later, spend week preparing for the jury trial (looking up cases; making sure arguments are ready; preparing jury instructions, &cetera). Go to prepare the Defendant in jail 3 days before trial. Halfway thru preparation the Defendant decides to take the plea agreement. Go to the courthouse the next day and spend two hours getting the jury called off. The day of trial Client comes into court and pleads guilty2. Work since the continuance 10 hours ($900).
Total amount of payment due by hourly rate: $1,710.
Cap imposed by the Legislature: $395.
The worst thing about it isn't really all the work I did without compensation. I long ago realized that if my indigent clients' rights were going to be actual rather than a nice theory I was going to have to lose money on almost any jury trial for them. The worst of it is that I did all that work without compensation and never even got to put on a jury trial I thought I could win.
1 In theory the Commonwealth of Virginia allows us to bill $90 per hour in court appointed cases.
2 And I leave extremely frustrated because I think the case was very winnable.
10/07/2003
10/07/2003
10/07/2003
10/07/2003
10/07/2003
(1) Don't defraud the Road Accident Fund in South Africa or they will take your house.
(2) An attorney can be sued for not doing a good enough job. I am curious as to what the truth is behind the claim that the attorney didn't talk to an important witness. I cannot count the number of times a Defendant has sworn to me that "GG" saw it all and could back his story but couldn't tell me a real name, an address, or a phone number. And then, of course, it's all my fault when I can't find him or get a subpoena served on him to make him come to court.
(3) Mr. Divorce is charged with owing the IRS $995,000.
10/06/2003
10/06/2003
10/06/2003
10/06/2003
(1) Muhammad moves for dismissal based upon the fact that law enforcement appears to have leaked information to reporters writing a book - or removal of the possible death penalty - or exclusion of any evidence in the book - or. . .
(2) The federal supreme court will decide whether the fact that a jury received wrong instructions is enough to require a new trial in a case where the government is trying to kill the Defendant. The closure argument disturbs me in death penalty cases; every time I hear it it sounds like the prosecutor is saying, "Just let us kill the S.O.B. and it will be the end to all this useless legal wrangling." Of course, the problem in these cases is that, if the Defendant is innocent or the jury would have sentenced him to life, once you kill him there is closure.
(3) The prosecution increased a Defendant's sentence after he tries to commit suicide. What exactly does that accomplish?
(4) Driving a car can lead to homicide charges sometimes because of your own actions and sometimes because of the actions of others.
(5) 15 years later a murder is proven.
(6) A "honor killing" in London. I don't think this jerk will get only 6 months in jail in Britain. Somehow, I doubt the reasoning which allows this kind of garbage will cut it in civilization:
[L]enient sentences deter women from sin. [Greater punishment is] contradictory to . . . tradition and Islamic teachings.(7) Charging a mother with child abuse because she left her daughter with the boyfriend who killed the girl and the child had been previously injured.
(8) N.C. kills a man.
(9) The defense argues involuntary intoxication. The prosecution says the Defendant ain't intoxicated she's just touched. The judge finds her guilty.
(10) It's hard to defend your client when he's convinced the victims are still alive and visiting him in jail.
(11) The NC Peterson Case: Prosecutors close by saying that only a novelist (such as the defendant) could have put together the story he's trying to sell you. The Defense counters with the top ten reasons not to believe the prosecutor's theory.
10/05/2003
10/05/2003
New laws that make carrying a firearm an offence with a mandatory five-year sentence have won little favour with officers on the street. 'It changes nothing,' said one drug squad detective who asked to remain anonymous. 'Most of the kids carry guns in order to protect themselves when they are dealing. They are going around with enough crack or heroin to ensure that they go away for 10 years if they get caught. Because of that, they feel they have nothing to lose and everything to gain by carrying a gun. They carry them just for the hell of it.'
10/05/2003
Of course, the worst it can do is impose a 13 day loss of pay.
10/05/2003
10/05/2003
10/05/2003
(1) The FBI is investigating solely because a location returned big verdicts. I hope there is more to this than the article indicates. Otherwise, it appears to be intimidation.
(2) Good gracious. It looks like Danville promoted half of its police force.
(3) Is there any difference between CSI and real forensic scientists?
(4) 2 tons of marijuana go to the feds to prosecute.
(5) 4 years later, after the Crown refused to prosecute, an inquest "decided that police officers used dangerous, excessive and unlawful force restraining Roger Sylvester, a vulnerable and mentally ill young man, in the prone or three-quarters prone position for some 15-20 minutes until he stopped breathing."
10/05/2003
10/05/2003
10/05/2003
10/05/2003
10/05/2003
10/05/2003
10/05/2003
10/05/2003
10/05/2003
10/05/2003
That strikes me as not being absolutely true. Taking a copy of a piece of software does not deny others its use as taking a car does. There also seem to be a business models which allow the free distribution of software. I can download my favorite web browser (Opera) as many times as I wish without paying a penny. I can also download other browsers (Mozilla Firebird or Netscape) free of charge. There's free media playing software such as Real Player and Quick Time. There's free office software such as Abiword and OpenOffice Suite.
All of which would seem to indicate that there is a big difference between stealing even one Yugo and making several copies of a piece of software. Not that I am championing theft of intellectual property but by its very nature this particular type of theft makes something more available rather than less. Of course, the creation of value in intellectual property depends on some sort barrier to the availability of the intellectual property. As these barriers become more and more artificial1 - in response to the easy availability of information and its derivatives thru technology such as VCR's, computers, high-speed internet, writeable CD's/DVD's, &cetera - it becomes harder and harder to convince someone that he should pay $25 for the newest CD (for the one good song on it) or $60 for a computer game when he can pick up either for free using Limewire.
1 The most frustrating of these for me - while not exactly concerning intellectual property - was when the MLB made radio stations stop broadcasting baseball games over the internet. I used to listen to a Red's game every couple of days on Ohio or Kentucky stations which carried them. This obviously helped baseball by keeping alive interest in baseball in locations where there is no nearby pro team. Since I moved to Virginia and MLB cut me off I've not been able to root for my team and there is no team which is rooted for locally (despite whatever delusions the owners of the Orioles might have as they fight to keep a team from being in D.C./Northern Virginia). Of course, I could go to MLB's site and pay to listen but I refuse to pay for an artificial barrier set up by MLB and basically don't pay much attention to baseball anymore except for the Little League World Series, parts of games in the MLB playoffs if the game is good, and I try to go to a couple of the AAA Braves games in Richmond each year.
10/04/2003
"[B]y its nature cheating is intended to go undetected, and trends in unethical behavior can be hard to document."
10/04/2003
(1) Being in charge of the big cases gets you promoted: Martha's prosecutor gets a promotion.
(2) Plotting to keep your law license can be a felony.
10/04/2003
(1) Discussing Ashcroft's latest actions.
(2) A bio of Ashcroft and short discussion of his importance in the Bush administration.
10/04/2003
10/04/2003
10/04/2003
(1) A 52 year old going after girls as young as 11. Disgusting.
(2) At the Air Force Academy one cadet is charged with rape while another is punished because he "valued sex and money above honor and dignity."
10/04/2003
(1) The Hong Kong authorities have allowed an inmate to offer a reward for evidence of his innocence.
(2) Did drugs cause a death in jail?
10/03/2003
10/03/2003
10/03/2003
In what appears to have been a move calculated to hurt the Justice Department as much as possible, the judge in the Moussaoui case didn't dismiss the case but absolutely crippled it.
10/03/2003
10/03/2003
10/03/2003
For what it is worth, the 9th Circuit has declared DNA tests (and thus DNA databases) without suspicion of illegal activity an unconstitutional search. Basically it called the taking of DNA a fishing expedition.
Basically, I agree with them. However, I live in Virginia, in the 4th Circuit where quoting the 9th is the death knell of any legal argument.
The question I have is that if this database is unconstitutional what is the status of the fingerprint databases?
10/03/2003
10/03/2003
10/03/2003
(1) Out of control hazing at football camp.
(2) 311 Boyz.
10/02/2003
10/02/2003
Personally, being a great believer in the common sense of juries, I think jurors should be allowed to decide whether the prosecution is applying the law in a just manner. It's condescending to say that 12 regular citizens cannot tell if charging someone with larceny for taking a paperclip from work is justified (yes I know it's an extreme example).
Generally, it is my belief that prosecutors don't like jurors to exercise this power (they always have it but it is verboten to mention it during a trial in most States) because it has a lopsided democratization effect. When "the mob" gets out of control in most of life's situations it can act in a way that is either pro or anti government. In court the prosecutor, by bringing a particular charge, has limited the mob's ability to be pro-government1. Therefore, should the jury think that the prosecutor has not been severe enough it cannot void his decision in favor of a more stringent penalty even if a more stringent penalty is justified2.
On the other hand, should the jurors think that the prosecution has overcharged or that applying the law as written to the Defendant is unjust they can unequivocally show their displeasure by refusing to convict. Why do you think that prosecutors fight so hard to keep the mention of mandatory sentences in Exile cases from being put before the jury? If a jury knew that the Defendant would get a mandatory 5 years in prison because he had a felony 20 years ago, he borrowed his son's car to go to the market to pick up some bread, and the son kept a pistol in the glove compartment which the father knew about (but forgot) would the jury convict if it were allowed to decide whether the charge was just? Anyone who has seen the wide eyes when jurors are told they must impose the mandatory time knows that there's a good chance they would not.
Which, all-in-all, is a long winded way of saying that I understand why prosecutors dislike this role of the jury. That judges disapprove of it also is a posting for another day . . .
1 I am assuming for this argument a prosecutor who makes an appropriate charge Of course, a prosecutor may overcharge for leverage, political reasons, or as a trial tactic. Usually this occurs in the manner of the Defendant being given a number of charges for a single happening. An example is when a man is charged with forging, uttering, and grand larceny for handing over one bad check. If the law limited the prosecutor to the most serious of the charges in this one temporal event (one event = one charge) it would make much more sense but by charging all three two can be negotiated away and a felony conviction obtained with less muss and fuss.
2 Yes, I realize that it is unlikely that a jury would be tougher than the prosecutor but we're talking theory here, not reality.
10/02/2003
10/02/2003
(1) Because of its "relatively high rates of crime and gang activity" Richmond is the first city in the U.S. granted $250,000,000 from the feds to fight gangs.
(2) The leader of the Outlaws is found guilty of racketeering, conspiracy and obstruction of justice but acquitted of two murders and conspiring to distribute cocaine.
10/02/2003
(1) The federal supreme court is being asked to decide if someone born in the U.S. can be detained without recourse to the legal system.
(2) I know we're all shocked by this but Malvo invoked his 5th Amendment rights when called in the Muhammad case.
10/02/2003
(1) A bar code scam nets $400,000, 15 months in jail, and a free trip out of the country.
(2) A stock swindle nets $100,000,000, 114 indictments, and (eventually) up to 8 years in prison.
10/02/2003
(1) Crown prosecutors will have to start pulling 24 duty shifts because the burden of charging is switching from police to the prosecution.
(2) In L.A. the deputies have been sick en masse.
(3) Prisons cannot take away a prisoner's money to cover the prison's expenses.
Ambush in Bartlette
Chapters 1 - 13
Chapters 1 - 13
Law & Theory
- LAWS
- Va.'s Versions of Mayhem (malicious wounding et al): 4 In One Statute ~ Graphic
- Aggravated Malicious Wounding
- The Moped Exception
- Rape by Lie: 1 ~ 2 ~ 3
- No Intent Needed
- Arresting in a House
- Common Law Trespass
- Certificate of Analysis Introduction
- Probable Cause: Car Passengers
- Obstruction of Justice Limited
- Stealing Electronic Items
- Stolen Value: Price Tags
- Stolen Value: No Price Tags
- Stolen Value: Electronic Items
- No Weekend Jail on Felonies
- Obstruction of Justice Limited
- No Trifurcation
- No More Beer at the Barbeque
- Respondeat Superior
- DUI & Reckless Driving
- Can You Steal From the Dead?
- Outlawry Outlawed
- Felony 2d Degree Murder
- Banishment
- Computer Fraud
- Insta-Deputy
- PROCEDURE
- Using Statements Made During Plea Negotiations: 1 ~ 2a ~ 2b ~ 2c
- Invoking Right to Attorney in Virginia
- Who Prosecutes Misdemeanors?
- Expungement
- Surrebuttal
- Virginia's Reasonable Doubt
- Reasonable Doubt II
- Instruction: Right to Arm
- Virginia Castle Doctrine1 ~ 2 ~ 3 ~
- Dismissed with Prejudice
- SENTENCING
- I. Limitations on Right of Judge to Alter a Sentence
- II. Limitations on Right of Judge to Alter a Sentence
- III. Limitations on Right of Judge to Alter a Sentence
- Probation & Suspended Time
- Advisement in Virginia
- Jury v. Judge (sentencing roles)
- Limits on Evidence Presentable to a Jury
- Jury Sentencing Possibilities
- &CETERA
- Witnesses & Writ of Actual Innocence
- Domestic Battery & Firearm Possession
- Domestic Battery & Testimony I
- Domestic Battery & Testimony II
- Domestic Battery & Testimony III
- Domestic Battery & Testimony IV
- Shall Doesn't Mean Shall
- Just Following Orders
- Lycurgus Not Welcome in Virginia
Practice Tips
Specific Cases
- Jones:Trespass = Search
- Shatzer:4th Amendment Expiration Date
- Gant: Limiting Car Searches
- Montejo: No more 6th Amendment Protections
- Padilla & the Prosecutor
- Ventris: Allowing Unconstitutional Questioning
- Carroll Doctrine
Legal Theory
- Best Way to Choose a Judge
- What's a Prosecutor?
- Defense Attorney Purpose
- Plea Agreement Actualities
- The Big 4: Why I can't Go To Jail: 1 ~ 2
- Liquor Use Laws
- How to Fix Va.'s Court of Appeals
- Punishment Scale
- Punishment Scale Explained
- Punishment: There but for the Grace of God
- Heavy Sentences (1)
- Heavy Sentences (2)
- Probation
- Change Felonies to Misdemeanors
- Do Justice?
- Kentucky v. Virginia
- Must Prosecutors Disprove Affirmative Defenses?
- Drug Schedules & Punishment
- Defendants & Situational Sincerity
- 1) Immorality in Pleading Not Guilty
- 2) Immorality of Pleading Not Guilty
- Posner v. Hart & Strict Liability
- More Posner & Strict Liability
- Pre-Stare Decisis
- Let Juries Find People Innocent
- Tell Jury Elements Pretrial
- Falsity of Malum Prohibitum (1)
- Falsity of Malum Prohibitum (2)
- Falsity of Malum Prohibitum (3)
- Brady
- Writ of Spite & Hatred
- Various Riot Acts
- Tazers
- Finding of Innocent
- No Appellate Oral Arguments
- CrimJustice Purpose
- Pro Se Defendants
- Misdirecting the Police
- Stress Seekers?
- Plea Agreement
- Faking Probable Cause I
- Faking Probable Cause II
- Faking Probable Cause III
- Faking Probable Cause IV
- Legalese: Name Changes
- How Could We Best Select a Judge
- RICO & Bin Laden
- Requirement of Defense Attorneys
- Should Lawyers Make Clients Confess?
- Crummy Hired Defense Attorneys
- Noble Defense?
Back When I was a Defense Attorney
FEB03
Jury
Jury
JUN03
A Week in the Life
A Week in the Life
JUL03
A Week in the Life
OCT03
A Week in the Life
DEC03
A Week in the Life
JAN04
5 Events
A Needed Sign
A Week in the Life
Trial Desperation
A Week in the Life
A Week in the Life
Quick Panic
FEB04
Supress Motion
A Week in the Life
A Week in the Life
MAR04
A Week in the Life
Closing Argument
APR04
A Week in the Life
A Week in the Life
A Week in the Life
A Week in the Life
MAY04
A Week in the Life
A Week in the Life
A Week in the Life
JUN04
Chocolate Chip Marijuana
A Week in the Life
High School Critique
JUL04
A Week in the Life
Cripple v. Cop
01 Long Week
02 Long Week
03 Long Week
04 Long Week
05 Long Week
I'm a Narc
AUG04
Frustrating Day
Damn Yankee Defense
A Week in the Life
SEP04
Angry Relative
01 Long Week
OCT04
01 Long Week
02 Long Week
03 Long Week
04 Long Week
-----
01 Long Week
02 Long Week
03 Long Week
NOV04
Client Families
DEC04
01 Long Week
02 Long Week
03 Long Week
04 Long Week
05 Long Week
06 Long Week
Surprise at Prelim
Confronted
JAN05
A Sentencing Hearing
Sales Lady Visits
FEB05
Purse Search Brief
Violent Insane Client
MAR05
Affidavit of Truthfulness
Juvenile Detention Visit
Moments in the Life
Fail to Visit
APR05
Trial of the Century
MAY05
Transcript: Court Argument I Won
A Day in Court
Moments in the Life
Angry Jury Day
Angry Jury 02
JUN05
Eureka Sentencing Moment
My Own PI
Innovative Jail Phone Call
A Moment in Court
A Moment in Court
JUL05
Huh?
Raccoon Attack
AUG05
Picking on a Prosecutor Intern
Moments in the Life
SEP05
Victory by Speedy Trial
OCT05
Kicking Myself
A Day in the Life
Insane Client & 15 Deputies
Torture by Judge
A Federal Habeas
NOV05
Invisolawyer
Petition Freak Out
Moments in the Life
Moments in the Life
State Habeas
DEC05
Moments in the Life
JAN06
Jury Trial Fizzle
FEB06
A Bench Trial
Bittersweet "Victories"
A Prosecutor Tries to do Right
MAR06
What Just Happened?
Va. Worse than Conn.
Illness as a Defense Attorney
Failed Prison Visit
APR06
Heard in a Courthouse
Appellate Court Argument 01
Va. Court of Appeals
MAY06
Heard in Court
JUN06
Bad Press
Entire History of a Trial
Bad Press 02
JUL06
I Must be too Good
AUG06
Announce Becoming Prosecutor
The Last Life in a Week
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Client Communication
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CYA Letter: Felony Client
CYA Letter: Appeal
-----
Dear Mr. Jailhouse LawyerConversation between Inmates about Lawyers
Innocent Client Pleads Guilty
Client Parents
Time as a Prosecutor
JAN07
The New Office
FEB07
Different Court Diferent Behavior
Competency
MAR07
Cats
Ma'am I'm the Prosecutor
JUN07
I know nothing
23 Felonies
JUL07
Cross
Cross II
2d Simplest Explanation
OCT07
Jury
FEB08
CrimLaw Prosecutorial Corollary #1
MAY08
Paranoia
JUN08
Why Not Drop?
JUL09
Buy Me Dinner First
AUG09
Jury Sentencing Argument
SEP09
Is Litter Patrol Jail?
OCT09
Paperwork Closing Argument
APR10
Bubonic Bob & the Creative Judge
JUL10
Finding the Perfect Witness
APR12
Small Town Cop : Big City Lawyer
JUN12
Maturity Ain't Orange
Criminal Law
Sentencing Law and Policy
FourthAmendment
Law of Criminal Defense
CrimProf
White Collar Crime Prof
4th Circuit
...
Simple Justice
Defending People
a public defender
Underdog
Indefensible
DUIblog
Southern District of Fla.
Criminal Defense
Harris Co. Crim Justice
...
Seeking Justice
Crime and Consequences
The Chicago Syndicate
Patterico's Pontifications
The Magistrate's Blog
Trials & Tribulations
Charon QC
Changing the Court
Virginia Blogs
SW Virginia Law
Va Poli Blogs
Vivian Page
Bearing Drift
Not Larry Sabato
Worthwhile
Bloggingheads.tv
Gruntled Center
WindyPundit
day by day
The Faculty Lounge
Legal Scholarship Blog
PrawfsBlog
Justice & Drugs
Ernie the Attorney
Bag & Baggage
TWIT Live
Spill.com
Tekzilla
Sentencing Law and Policy
FourthAmendment
Law of Criminal Defense
CrimProf
White Collar Crime Prof
4th Circuit
...
Simple Justice
Defending People
a public defender
Underdog
Indefensible
DUIblog
Southern District of Fla.
Criminal Defense
Harris Co. Crim Justice
...
Seeking Justice
Crime and Consequences
The Chicago Syndicate
Patterico's Pontifications
The Magistrate's Blog
Trials & Tribulations
Charon QC
Changing the Court
Virginia Blogs
SW Virginia Law
Va Poli Blogs
Vivian Page
Bearing Drift
Not Larry Sabato
Worthwhile
Bloggingheads.tv
Gruntled Center
WindyPundit
day by day
The Faculty Lounge
Legal Scholarship Blog
PrawfsBlog
Justice & Drugs
Ernie the Attorney
Bag & Baggage
In case anyone out there needs this warning: This ain't legal advice. Everything in the blog is off the cuff and no one goes back and reads all the cases and statutes before blogging. The law may have changed; cases misread and misunderstood two years ago can still lead to a clinging misperception. Courts in your county, city, or State probably don't operate as described herein. Feel free to be inspired, but YOU MUST ALWAYS DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH OR HIRE A COMPETENT ATTORNEY TO DO SO because I haven't.
Tech &
Vlogs
This Week in TechVlogs
TWIT Live
Spill.com
Tekzilla
Archive
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013